Atelier de th茅orie du droit: Wrongs, wrongfulness, and culpability in indirect discrimination law
Atelier de th茅orie du droit avec notre invit茅 , professeur agr茅g茅 de droit 脿 Oxford. Ses int茅r锚ts de recherche comprennent le droit public, le droit de la discrimination et la th茅orie du droit. Il a r茅cemment publi茅 une monographie intitul茅e 'A Theory of Discrimination Law' (OUP). He parlera d'un article qu'il pr茅pare sur les torts, l'illic茅it茅 et la culpabilit茅 dans le droit de la discrimination indirecte.
搁茅蝉耻尘茅
(En anglais seulement) In this paper, we examine the nature of the duty-imposing norms in indirect discrimination (ID) law. We aim to clarify two main issues. First, we determine the extent to which these norms should be understood as imposing particular duties 鈥� duties owed to particular individuals or as imposing general duties 鈥� duties owed to no one in particular 鈥� or, perhaps, both. Let鈥檚 call this the duty inquiry. Second, we clarify the extent to which considerations of culpability should be considered to be aspects of the wrong(s) of discrimination. Let鈥檚 call this the culpability inquiry. This paper is motivated by a recent trend in British and American law to doubt the legitimacy of the prohibition on ID and to attempt to curtail its operation. We show through these inquiries that the prohibition on ID is legitimate. To do so, we carve a nuanced conceptual location for ID, as necessitated in part by corrective justice and in part by distributive justice.
The first part of the paper provides a general explanation of the concepts of particular and general duties. The second and third parts undertake the duty inquiry and culpability inquiry respectively. We find that prima facie indirect discrimination usually entails the breach of two distinct duties, making it wrong and wrongful. We also claim that while indirectly discriminatory acts can be wrongful though not otherwise culpable, culpability considerations are nonetheless relevant to supporting the liability regime for indirect discrimination. The fourth part offers observations on the structure of discrimination law in light of our analysis.
Pour davantage d'informations, contactez le professeur paul.miller [at] mcgill.ca (Paul Miller).
