The Mysticism of International Legal Argumentation
The Oppenheimer Chair in Public International Law, in collaboration with Inter Gentes: The McGill Journal of International Law & Legal Pluralism, is proud to welcome , Professor of Public International Law at the University of Manchester.
Abstract
In this conference, Jean d鈥橝spremont will introduce his book on 鈥榯he mysticism of international legal argumentation鈥�. Whether it is construed as a set of processes, rules, ideas, discourses, or practices, international law is being argued according to pre-reflective聽structures. This book is intended as an intervention in the contemporary legal debates about the pre-reflective structures of international legal argumentation. In particular, it seeks to shed a new light on the pre-reflective structures of international聽legal argumentation by virtue of an original descriptive and evaluative framework that distinguishes between the gospels and the sacred texts of international law. This book does so in discussing some of the most central patterns of聽argumentative structures of international law, namely sources, statehood, ius cogens, responsibility, custom and the fundamental rights of states.
Applied to contemporary international legal argumentation this three-tier framework will help demonstrate that some resilient type of idealism lingers in international legal argumentation and comes in the form of mysticism. By mysticism, the聽chapters of this book refer to the false genealogy that is established between some patterns of argumentative structures (gospels) and some authoritative instruments (sacred texts) as well as the mainstream conceptualization of such gospels as聽rules properly so-called. While offering reflections on the enduring mystical character of international legal thought and practice, this book will simultaneously argue that mysticism is an inextricable component of international legal argumentation聽in that it is what makes international legal argumentation possible. Short of mysticism, this book argues, international lawyers would be unable to formulate international legal arguments and battle with one another when interpreting and聽constructing the law and the world.
About the speaker
Jean d鈥橝spremont is Professor of Public International Law at the University of Manchester where he founded the Manchester International Law Centre (MILC) with Professor Iain Scobbie. He is General Editor of the Cambridge Series in聽International and Comparative Law and director of the Oxford Database on International Organizations. He is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the European Journal of International Law. He is series editor of the Melland Schill聽Studies in International Law.
.
