Leaving an abusive partner reduces the odds of recurrent intimate partner violence
The articles listed below can be accessed through the corresponding journal website or accessed at a local library or university.
Leaving an abusive partner reduces the odds of recurrent intimate partner violence
Source: Sonis, J. & Langer, M. (2008). Risk and
protective factors for recurrent intimate partner violence in a
cohort of low-income inner-city women. Journal of Family
Violence, 23(7), 529-538.
Reviewed by: Tara Black
Studies using police reports and emergency room visit data have
documented an alarming association between leaving an abusive
partner and increased risk of future abuse. Interpretation of these
statistics, however, is complicated by the fact that these
statistics do not take into consideration the dynamics that lead to
the decision to leave an abusive relationship, and in particular
fail to consider the extent to which an escalation in the severity
of abuse may be both precipitate the decision to leave as well as
increase the risk of severe recurrence.Â
Using longitudinal data from the Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study,
Sonis and Langer examine the predictors of recurrence and severity
of interpersonal violence (IPV) in order to better understand the
dynamics underlying associated with leaving an abusive partner and
recurrence to abuse. Contrary to conventional thinking, the study
found that after controlling for a number of several risk and
protective factors, leaving an abusive partner reduced the odds of
recurrent IPV by about two-thirds (OR = 0.30) compared to not
leaving. In contrast, pregnancy, frequency of IPV in the previous
year, and the partner’s use of power and control tactics increased
the odds of recurrent IPV. In addition, ethnicity and partner
violence outside the home predicted severity of recurrent
IPV.Â
This study provides important evidence that because women often
leave abusive partners because of escalating abuse, these women
would in fact be at higher risk if they remained in the
relationship. However, it is important to note that whether women
leave or stay, escalating frequency of abuse increases the risk of
severe abuse.
Methodological Notes:
This study used data from the Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study,
a study of 492 low-income inner-city women who had previously been
abused by their partners. The sample was assembled by screening and
interviewing women who were seeking health care at one of four
medical sites in inner-city Chicago. Of the original sample of 492,
321 (66%) completed a follow-up interview. The women who were lost
at follow-up had no differences from those not lost on 34 of 36
factors assessed. The 2 items that were significantly different
were homelessness and unemployment: women who were lost to
follow-up were more likely to be homeless, and/or unemployed
compared to women who completed the study. However, there was no
association between these 2 factors and recurrence of IPV.
Follow-up ranged from 3 to 23 months; however there was no
association between duration of follow-up and recurrence. The
generalizability of the the study is limited to the study
recruitment strategy that focused on low-income women seeking
health care.
to view the Research
Watch archive.